Wednesday, September 5, 2007
Sunset on the Homestead
Tuesday, September 4, 2007
Book Review
I was given this book by a friend at church. He said he's about 90% convinced of the author's point, but still holds some reservations.
The basic premise of the book is that the King James Version of the Bible is the only true word of God, the best translation available, and that the manuscripts that form the basis for all other modern translations (with the exception of the New King James Version) are unreliable. Actually, the author goes beyond calling those manuscripts unreliable to actually assert that there was a conspiracy on the part of those who translated them to change the Bible to fit their views.
In a nutshell, many Christians and Biblical scholars consider the Greek manuscripts that the modern translations come from to better because they are older. The logic is that since they are older they are more reliable because the time between the original writing and the oldest manuscript is less. Less time = less chance they were changed or that there are errors.
For example, take the Gospel of Luke. If Luke wrote his gospel in A.D. 40, and the oldest manuscript (copy) of that gospel was written in A.D. 150, then it would be considered more accurate than a manuscript (copy) of Luke written in A.D.1100. Less chance that there were errors in copying or changes made, right?
The author rejects that in the case of the modern translations. He questions the motives and integrity of the writers of the manuscripts, and the translators who translated them in the late 1800s. He also plays up the authenticity of the newer manuscripts from which the KJV is translated, as well as the Catholic monk who translated them: Erasmus.
I have to admit I never finished this book. I got through about half of it, at which point it got way too in the weeds about translation techniques, and their worthiness. I simply got bored and confused and lost interest. The main thrust of the book is in the first half anyway. I found the whole thing a bit ridiculous. There differences between the KJV and the NIV (as one example) are minimal, and I think if someone wanted to change the Bible through some malicious intent to deny the diety of Christ (as one example) they should have done a better job. My disinterest mounted even more when I found out that there are just as many books out there trying to malign the integrity of the KJV as there are ones trying to malign the integrity of the modern translations.
Frankly, I'm saddened by all this bickering. If we spent as much time helping others and witnessing to the lost as we do arguing amongst ourselves about minutia, we might actually be able to make a difference for Christ. That is one thing I have learned and come to appreciate in our new home church. It is a decidedly non-denominational gathering of Christian brothers and sisters who hold each other up, read and speak the word of God in love, and can disagree on the minutia while still loving each other and witnessing together. We've got former Baptists, Methodists, Catholics, and Church of Christ. Yet we all seem to get along together for the larger purpose of serving Christ. The existance of denominations has always bothered me, and although I believe the Baptists have it 99% right, I will never let that keep me from fellowshiping and serving with other Christians for the glory of God. Jesus said his church was to be a city on a hill, not several hundred different cities scattered about fighting amongst themselves.
My current book is on the Lewis and Clark expedition. I've been bitten by the history bug again, and will report on it when I'm done.
Monday, September 3, 2007
Fall Garden Pics
Friday, August 31, 2007
What Can A Pig Teach Us?
Thursday, August 30, 2007
Our Birds
These are the ducks currently. They are three weeks old and growing nicely. We originally purchased six, but two have died. That surprised us because everything we've read said that ducks are hardier than chickens. We now do not have enough ducks to cook for Thanksgiving and try one before hand. If we lose any more we'll have to buy a small turkey to have enough food. Oh well.Monday, August 27, 2007
Fall Garden
This weekend we planted the last of the fall garden. Here's the tally of what we have growing: peas, green beans, pumpkins, watermelon, corn, tomatoes, various herbs, carrots, lettuce, bell peppers, jalepenos, strawberries, and buckwheat.
What is buckwheat, you might ask? Well, it's a type of wheat you can harvest, but we didn't plant it for food. Buckwheat can be used as a "green manure crop" in beds you don't currently have veggies in. That means you grow it because it is rich in nitrogen, will shade out the whole bed (preventing weeds and lessening water requirements), and will be tilled back into the soil before it goes to seed, so all that good plant matter can be composting in the bed over winter. It is a relatively cheap seed that sprouts quickly and crowds out the weeds. You can also plant bush beans or peas as a "green manure crop". We did in one section. The seeds are more expensive, but you get a harvest out of them, so it's worth it. This is our first time trying a "green manure crop" and we're hoping it works as advertised.
We also added some perennials to our garden. We planted 3 rose bushes for some color and so Regina could harvest rose hips (apparently they're good for you and can be made into a tea). We also planted some cherry bushes. The cherry bushes have done great and are sprouting green foliage already.
One valuable lesson I learned this weekend is to not let your gas-powered tiller run out of oil. I wasted a good hour or more repairing it because I was too stupid to check the oil. On the bright side, I didn't have to take it to a mechanic, and learned a little about how tillers work.
The majority of the work now will be watering and weeding until harvest time.
I will post a few pictures from time to time so you can see our progress.
Friday, August 24, 2007
Is Raw Milk Safe?
We have all heard about the dangers of raw milk and the praises of pasturized. In reading an article on the subject, I read one USDA official quoted as saying that feeding your kids raw milk is like giving them a ticking time bomb. What made that comment astounding was that this same official grew up drinking raw milk on a farm and never once got sick. So what's the truth?
Well, like I said before: it depends. If the cow is healthy, milking and processing practices are clean, and it is stored properly, raw milk is perfectly safe. In fact, raw milk is heathlier for you. Did you know there's good bacteria and bad bacteria out there? I ask because there are a lot of people out there that don't know some bacteria are good. We've been sort of brainwashed to fear bacteria, and super-sanitize everything. There are bad bacteria out there that we should guard against, but there's plenty of good bacteria we should appreciate. Our skin is covered with bacteria, both good and bad. The good bacteria actually protect us and keep the bad from taking over. If you were to kill all the good bacteria on your skin, the bad would have a royal road in, and make you massively sick.
Well, these good bacteria are also present in our guts, and help us break down our food. The good bacteria in raw milk helps boost these good guys in our intestines and make us healthier. Raw milk is also full of good enzymes that are catalysts for all the processes in our cells. Pasturization kills these good bacteria and destroys these enzymes. Pasturized milk is still good for calories and calcium, but that's about it. Raw milk sours when the good and bad bacteria grows to a high levels. A little souring is good, and makes butter, sour cream, and yogurt taste better. However, when milk is pasturized and all bacteria are killed, only the bad bacteria get back into the milk from the air, and the milk doesn't spoil...it turns rancid.
So if raw milk is so good, why does the government require the milk companies to pasturize it? Well, the answer goes back to the 1800s. As people began moving off of farms, access to milk began decreasing. Some tried to ship it in from the country, but people got sick because it spoiled due to lack of refrigeration. People then tried setting up milking operations inside the city to get fresh milk to people faster. These were usually small lots in cities where cows were crammed together in unsanitary conditions, and would often develop fatal leg problems from standing on concrete all day. Not to mention, they were fed whatever was available, which was usually moldy grain or garbage from restaurants. Again, people got sick from unsanitary practices. Pasturization and refrigeration solved both these problems by killing all bacteria in the milk and helping it to last longer. Modern milk production and distrubution would not be possible without pasturization, so it's a good thing where needed.
However, if a person has access to raw milk that comes from a healthy cow, and is processed correctly, it is just as safe and even more healthy for you than pasturized. The best way to ensure these things is to raise and milk the cow yourself. Then there's no question. There are still some things to worry about. Brucellosis (undulant fever) is a disease spread by cows infected with brucella bacteria. Brucellosis can infect humans through raw milk and cause fever, sweating, weakness, headaches, and muscle aches. It is temporary, treated with antibiotics, and not fatal. It is also very rare in American dairy cattle. In fact, most states declare themselves brucellosis free. Texas recently lost that designation due to some cattle that got infected from Mexican cattle on the border, but there has not been a widespread outbreak in this state in decades. Cows can only get brucellosis from other cows. (Our cow is by herself in our pasture, and has no other cows around her in adjacent pastures.) Lastly, all dairy cattle are vaccinated for brucellosis annually as a preventitive measure. The risk is negligible. Most people that get sick from raw milk become ill due to common bacteria that get into the milk due to unsanitary milking and processing practices. Most farm families do not become sick, even from slightly spoiled milk because their bodies have built up immunities to the bacteria around the farm.
If you can get raw milk from someone you trust, I highly recommend it. Be prepared to pay a hefty price though. Organic raw milk can cost from $8-$13 per gallon. It is much cheaper to have your own cow. We probably pay the equivilant of what store-bought milk costs when all is said and done, so we get our raw milk at a significant discount. With milk prices heading up, we may actually end up saving money soon.

